As a Rust belt town of 65,000 people in eastern Indiana, Muncie may not be the most exciting place in the world. It doesn’t have beaches, year-round warm weather or much in the way of cosmopolitanism.
But for Laura Rivas, a cybersecurity engineer formerly of North Miami Beach, Florida, Muncie is perfect.
Before she moved there in 2022, life in Florida had become unbearable.
Climate crisis-strengthened hurricanes and flooding meant her homeowner’s insurance was skyrocketing.
“The climate has gotten so bad – every hurricane season was worse than the last,” she said recently. The insurance companies “couldn’t afford [to operate in Florida] any more”.
Miami has been dubbed “ground zero” for climate risk and sea levels along Florida’s coast have already risen by as much as 8in (20cm) since 1950.
Shortly after receiving a notice in the mail in 2022 that her homeowner’s insurance would rise to almost $3,000 monthly, she saw her stepfather interviewed on local TV. His own property in Fort Myers had been destroyed by a tornado.
Rivas made her mind up right then – it was time to go.
Now, she owns a sizable three-bed home in Muncie, works from home and is excited to go ice fishing this winter.
“My mortgage and homeowner’s insurance are $600 a month, total,” she said. “Five times less than my homeowners’ insurance for a home half the size in Florida.”
Rivas isn’t alone.
Thousands of Puerto Ricans have fled devastating hurricanes on the island in 2017 and 2022 for new lives in Buffalo, New York, where a thriving community is adding to the former Rust belt city’s human tapestry. Californians fleeing wildfires are moving to Duluth, Minnesota, a city on the shores of Lake Superior that was once described as being “climate-proof”.
Planners in Detroit, Cleveland and beyond are looking at how to upgrade their infrastructure ahead of a possible growth of climate-induced migration.
“It’s probably no coincidence that the majority of our movers to the midwest originate from Texas, California and Florida – states that are disproportionately impacted by climate change,” said Evan Hock of MakeMyMove, an Indianapolis-based company that partners with small cities across the country to offer incentives to remote workers to relocate. It has helped about 1,000 people from Colorado, Seattle and elsewhere move to small towns and cities in Indiana, Iowa, Missouri and elsewhere in the midwest.
“Many movers who relocate from the increasing heat of the south tell us they are happy to experience all four seasons and look forward to a winter that provides a break from the heat,” he said.
Still, this summer has shown that there is no escape from the effects of the climate crisis, regardless of location. The last week of August across the midwest saw record high temperatures. Cities such as Cleveland, Detroit and Ann Arbor were battered by intense storms in June and August. Last year, much of the region was blanketed in smoke for days from Canadian wildfires, fueling rounds of air quality advisories.
“Mental stress following flooding events can cause substantial health impacts, including sleeplessness, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder,” one government report on climate change in the midwest found.
Then there’s the infrastructural demands that an influx of people – housing and transportation to name two – and a growing population would place on communities.
“We still don’t know who will come and when they will come, and even if they will. But there’s a concern that the most vulnerable people in midwestern cities may be left behind again,” said Derek Van Berkel of the University of Michigan, who is strategizing with other researchers for an expected growing incoming population to the midwest and Great Lakes region in the years and decades ahead.
He and a team at the Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments (Glisa) project have done a survey which found the public is rather accepting of climate migrants even if some cities do not appear to want them.
“Because they are not often at the table to make those decisions, they’re the ones who potentially have to endure the fact that their area is gentrifying, or their tax rates are going up and they just can’t afford living in their community any more,” Van Berkel said.
For Rivas, some of the downsides of life in eastern Indiana include having to spend a little more on the specialty fruits and vegetables she likes – as well as longer delivery times. It’s also a little difficult meeting new people, and she says she’s keenly aware of the potential consequences of gentrification on locals. Despite having grown up in Chicago, she says the winter winds are also a major downside for her, though her wood-burning stove helps with that.
But one surprising upside is how Rivas, who has a Kamala Harris sticker on her phone, has connected with her Donald Trump-supporting neighbor. “We agree to disagree sometimes, but he’s helped me with a plumbing problem, and we connect over gardening,” she said.
In recent years, Muncie, whose economy was built on automotive and glass industries in the 20th century, has been rebounding. A local university has proposed a $200m revitalization project encompassing the campus and surrounding residential neighborhood west of downtown.
She also makes regular trips with her partner to card shops in Indianapolis, an hour’s drive west.
Furthermore, Rivas has grown a mullet hairstyle that many closely associate with non-cosmopolitan America.
“I’ve always wanted one since I was a kid,” she says. “Now, I’m finally in the place where it’s acceptable.”
As anyone who’s spent time in the saddle knows, riding a horse can be hard on your body. But can it change the way your skeleton looks?
The answer, according to archaeologists from the University of Colorado Boulder: It’s complicated. In a new study, the team drew on a wide range of evidence — from medical studies of modern equestrians to records of human remains across thousands of years.
The researchers concluded that horseback riding can, in fact, leave a mark on human skeletons, such as by subtly altering the shape of the hip joint. But those sorts of changes on their own can’t definitively reveal whether people have ridden horses during their lives. Many other activities, even sitting for long periods of time, can also transform human bones.
“In archaeology, there are vanishingly few instances in which we can tie a particular activity unequivocally to skeletal changes,” said Lauren Hosek, lead author of the study and an assistant professor in the Department of Anthropology at CU Boulder.
She and her colleagues reported their findings Sept. 20 in the journal Science Advances.
The results may have implications for researchers who study the origins of when humans first domesticated horses — and also cast doubt on a long-standing theory in archaeology known as the Kurgan hypothesis.
The first equestrians
The research lies at the center of what is among the old debates in archaeology, said William Taylor, a co-author of the new study and curator of archaeology at the CU Museum of Natural History.
He explained that the earliest, incontrovertible evidence of humans using horses for transport comes from the region around the Ural Mountains of Russia. There, scientists have uncovered horses, bridles and chariots dating back to around 4,000 years ago.
But the Kurgan hypothesis, which emerged in the early 20th century, argues that the close relationship between humans and horses began much earlier. Proponents believe that around the fourth millennium B.C., ancient humans living near the Black Sea called the Yamnaya first began galloping on horseback across Eurasia. In the process, the story goes, they may have spread a primordial version of the languages that would later evolve into English, French and more.
“A lot of our understanding of both the ancient and modern worlds hinges on when people started using horses for transportation,” Taylor said. “For decades, there’s been this idea that the distribution of Indo-European languages is, in some way, related to the domestication of the horse.”
Recently, scientists have pointed to human remains from the Yamnaya culture dating back to about 3500 B.C. as a key piece of evidence supporting the Kurgan hypothesis. These ancient peoples, the group argued, showed evidence of wear and tear in their skeletons that likely came from riding horses.
Hips can lie
But, in the new study, Hosek and Taylor argue that the story isn’t so simple.
Hosek has spent a lot of time poring over human bones to learn lessons about the past. She explained that the skeleton isn’t static but can shift and change shape over an individual’s lifetime. If you pull a muscle, for example, a reaction can emerge at the site where the muscle attaches to the underlying bone. In some cases, the bone can become more porous or raised ridges may form.
Reading those sorts of clues, however, can be murky at best. The hip joint is one example.
Hosek noted that when you flex your legs at the hip for long periods of time, including during long horse rides, the ball and socket of the hip joint may rub together along one edge. Over time, that rubbing can cause the round socket of the hip bone to become more elongated, or oval in shape. But, she said, other activities can cause the same kind of elongation.
Archaeological evidence shows that humans used cattle, donkeys and even wild asses for transport in some areas of western Asia centuries before they first tamed horses. Ancient peoples likely yoked these beasts of burden to pull carts or even smaller, two-wheeled vehicles that looked something like a chariot.
“Over time, this repetitive, intense pressure from that kind of jostling in a flexed position could cause skeletal changes,” Hosek said.
She’s seen similar changes, for example, in the skeletons of Catholic nuns from the 20th century. They never rode horses, but did take long carriage rides across the American West.
Ultimately, Hosek and Taylor say that human remains on their own can’t be used to put a date on when people first started riding horses — at least not with currently available science.
“Human skeletons alone are not going to be enough evidence,” Hosek said. “We need to couple that data with evidence coming out of genetics and archaeology and by looking at horse remains, too.”
Taylor added that the picture doesn’t look good for the Kurgan hypothesis:
“At least for now, none of these lines of evidence suggest that the Yamnaya people had domestic horses.”
Climate change and a range of other human impacts are putting marine animals at risk of extinction — even those living in almost pristine marine habitats and diverse coastal regions — reports a new study by Casey O’Hara of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the University of California, Santa Barbara, USA, and colleagues, published September 18, 2024 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE.
Human activities on land and sea, in combination with climate change, are degrading coastal ecosystems, increasing the risk of extinction for multiple species and threatening important ecosystem services that humans depend on. To effectively address these threats, however, it is important to understand where and to what extent human-caused stressors are impacting marine ecosystems.
In a new study, researchers estimated the impact of human activities on more than 21,000 marine animal species worldwide, taking into account their exposure and vulnerability to stressors, including fishing, shipping, and land-based threats. They then mapped the impacts across the global ocean, identifying locations where climate-driven impacts overlap with other human-caused stressors.
The researchers’ analysis showed that even relatively untouched habitats may still be home to species at elevated risk. Additionally, many coastal regions with a high diversity of species may be at greater risk than previously realized, based on earlier studies that focused on habitats, not species. Researchers also found that the impacts from climate change — namely, elevated sea surface temperature and ocean acidification — were greater than other human-caused stressors, regardless of the ecosystem studied.
Corals were the marine group most at risk overall, with molluscs including squid and octopuses, echinoderms like sea stars and sea urchins, and crustaceans such as shrimp, crabs and lobsters also deemed to be at especially high risk.
The results from this work provide a more complete understanding of which species and habitats are at risk, and where conservationists should target their efforts. The researchers hope this data can be combined with socioeconomic information to help prioritize effective, economically efficient and socially equitable conservation actions to benefit both nature and people.
Casey O’Hara adds: “Our species-focused approach helps identify spatially defined practices and activities that most affect at-risk marine species. While blanket protections such as exclusive marine reserves are effective at conserving marine biodiversity, they also can impose economic hardship on locals and provoke political opposition. We believe our work reveals opportunities for politically feasible, cost-effective targeted interventions to reduce biodiversity impacts, such as focused fishing gear restrictions, agricultural improvements to reduce nutrient runoff, and incentives for shipping speed reductions.”
A team of international scientists alarmed by the loss of biodiversity across the world due to climate change has proposed a new approach to managing vulnerable landscapes, focusing on sites that are least impacted by changing weather.
Known as climate-change refugia, these places experience weather conditions that are the most favourable for their survival and could hold the key to reducing species extinctions, ecologists say.
In a new paper authored by scientists from Australia, Canada, the United States and Hungary, the researchers have laid out a framework to identify, protect and restore refugia from climate change.
The paper, published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, calls for an alternative to traditional conservation efforts, which have focused on creating static protected areas.
Conservation biologist and lead author, Associate Professor Gunnar Keppel from the University of South Australia, says the speed and scale at which climate change is progressing demands a new approach.
“Our planet is changing rapidly,” Assoc Prof Keppel says. “Events like the large-scale dieback of trees, mass bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef, unprecedented heatwaves, rapid thawing of glaciers and more frequent fires highlight the potential for major changes in biodiversity and ecosystems.
“The speed and scale of this change is challenging traditional approaches to conservation. For example, traditional protected areas may not shield threatened ecosystems from extreme droughts,” he says.
Instead, vulnerable ecosystems should be assessed along more practical lines to identify the places least impacted by drought stress, for example. It is here that species will have the best chance of resisting climate change, the authors argue.
“However, without support, species in these least impacted places may also struggle to survive as climate change progresses. Support for species could be in various forms, such as providing limited watering to trees in a valley during an extreme drought.
“The degree of management intervention required will depend on how well refugia can resist climate change impacts and on how severely they are affected by other disturbances. Refugia could potentially help to prevent the extinction of numerous species.”
Cotopaxi was built from the ground up to meet high goals, but any company can transform itself; it just takes the first step, beginning the critical self-reflection that thoughtful leaders can apply to their business. A certified B Corporation, Cotopaxi was founded in 2014 in Salt Lake City and is known for its sustainably designed outdoor products, Cotopaxi is a market leader in combining innovative gear with a solid commitment to social and environmental responsibility. And our guest today is Annie Agle, Cotopaxi’s Vice President of Sustainability and Impact. We’ll talk about the company’s strategies for sustainable design, circular economy practices, philanthropic initiatives, and more.

Cotopaxi supports education, housing, healthcare, climate solutions, and employment in impoverished communities, reportedly having helped more than 4.2 million people. The company’s holistic approach to sustainability includes rigorous assessments of environmental, social, and governance risks across its global value chain, and it aims for net-zero carbon emissions by 2040. That includes migrating all its product designs to use recycled, repurposed or responsibly sourced materials by 2025. You can learn more at https://www.cotopaxi.com/
Then, take some time to learn more about the sustainable fashion and outdoor gear movement:
Editor’s Note: This episode originally aired on June 24, 2024.
In the mid-1970s, seabird researcher Rob Barrett set out in a rubber boat to survey one of Norway’s largest seabird colonies. Equipped with a camera and a pair of binoculars, he planned to photograph the Syltefjord colony, in the far north of the country, then, back on land, develop the photos and fit them together to create a panorama. After that, he would count the birds.
As the boat drew closer to the cliffs, the gulls’ chattering increased to an overwhelming level. So did the smell. The cliffs rose 100 metres above him, kittiwakes filling every nook and crevice. It continued like that for five kilometres along the coast.
After two or three attempts, Barrett decided there were simply too many birds for him to count with what he had. Subsequently, a better-equipped team estimated the number of kittiwakes there at more than 250,000 birds.
Now, three decades of Barrett’s pictures from the Syltefjord colony, along with others gathered from museum archives, form the backbone point of a new series of before-and-after photographs showing the dramatic change to coastlines as seabirds have vanished.
Photographs: Rob Barrett and Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard/Rob Barrett
Today, just a few thousand birds remain at Syltefjord. “It is a very weak shadow of itself,” says Barrett. “It’s so sad to see it as it is.”
Almost 90% of Norway’s mainland kittiwakes have disappeared in the past four decades, as numbers of other seabird species also continue to fall. Between 2005 and 2015, the number of seabirds on the Norwegian mainland dropped by almost a third, according to the Norwegian Environment Agency.
While the photographs were taken in Norway, they illustrate a global shift. Half of Britain’s seabird species have declined in the past 20 years, including a 42% drop for kittiwakes and 49% for common gulls. Seabird numbers are estimated to have declined globally by 70% overall between 1950 and 2010.
“This is quite dramatic, but it is also one of the bird groups that have done most poorly when you look globally,” says Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard, a seabird ecologist at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research. “You have this whole cocktail of things impacting the populations.”
Photographs : Tycho Anker-Nilssen
Christensen-Dalsgaard came up with the idea for the photography project after seeing before-and-after pictures of retreating glaciers. “I was thinking, ‘Wow, but that’s exactly the same for the seabird cliffs’,” she says. “I thought that it would be a nice way of showing what we know, but which is really hard to communicate.”
Over the summers of 2022 and 2023, she returned with Barrett, who is now retired, to many of the colonies he had studied while working for the Tromsø Museum. Sometimes, Barrett could show Christensen-Dalsgaard exactly where he’d stood to take the original pictures.
Seabirds are important to life on land: they bring nutrients from the sea to the coast through their guano. They are reliant on the ocean for food, so the fact they are struggling suggests other marine species are in trouble. “It’s a quite strong signal that something is not right in the ocean,” says Christensen-Dalsgaard.
Of course, says Barrett, seabirds face a range of stressors, not just a lack of food. “It’s fishing and overfishing. It’s climate change. There’s habitat removal and change. There’s aquaculture. There’s the oil industry, there’s the gas industry, there’s wind power. There’s shipping going to and fro. There’s pollution, and then tourism and so on. It’s just endless.”
Photographs: Anders Beer Wilse/National Library and Tycho Anker-Nilssen
For Christensen-Dalsgaard and Barrett, the pictures illustrate a type of intergenerational memory loss called “shifting baseline syndrome”. When change is slow, each generation believes their version of the environment is normal. “They’ll read about what has happened before,” says Barrett, “but their mental picture of the woodlands or the coastline or the shore – or whatever – is their childhood up to the last 10 to 15 years. Not 50 years ago, when it was very, very different.”
Christensen-Dalsgaard says this can result in a lack of ambition. “We shouldn’t just accept how things are at the moment, and I think that’s what pictures like this can help us with, to understand what we should aim for.”
Photographs: Einar Brun/Tromsø Museum and Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard/Rob Barrett.
The project affected Christensen-Dalsgaard deeply. She had known the statistics of seabird decline, but says seeing it was another matter. She experienced a kind of “eco grief”, leading her to question her own work. “I was really paralysed, actually, by it. I was a bit like, ‘So what is the point of me sitting doing this every day? Why shouldn’t I just go in my garden and grow potatoes, because everything’s going to hell anyway?’”
It was a long process, she says, to reestablish a sense of purpose as a scientist. In the end, she took heart from the wider research community. “I can’t save the world,” she says, “but if we all piece our things together, then we’re moving somewhere.”
Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield on X for all the latest news and features
People’s deep connection with the ocean — their “marine identity” — can help us reset society’s relationship with the seas, new research led by Dr Pamela Buchan, from the University of Exeter, suggests.
A diverse, international group of marine researchers and practitioners met to discuss marine identity — based on testimony and photos from multiple countries.
The group included Diz Glithero of the Canadian Ocean Literacy Coalition, Dr Emma McKinley of Cardiff University who helped deliver the workshop, and others from across Europe, Africa, Indonesia, North America, and Australasia.
They found many common themes, including traditions and customs; and dependency on the ocean for recreation, livelihoods, health and sustenance.
They also found differences, such as negative ways the ocean can form part of identity — particularly for those whose communities and livelihoods are at risk from extreme weather.
The group agreed upon a broad definition of marine identity: “An identity rooted in how the ocean as a place supports the sense of self.” This is the first time that an international, cross-cultural definition of marine identity has been agreed upon.
Dr Pamela Buchan, a marine social science researcher, said: “Challenge 10 of the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030) calls for the restoration of society’s relationship with the ocean.
“We know identity drives people more than values — and people react to threats to their sense of self.
“As a result, marine identity could have a powerful impact on protecting and restoring the ocean.
“While many people feel deeply connected to the ocean, they may not think of this in terms of ‘marine identity’.”
By helping to define and raise awareness of the term, the researchers hope to promote “marine citizenship” — people exercising their right to be involved in marine decision-making and taking responsibility for the ocean.
Dr Buchan added: “We can foster this by encouraging easy access to the ocean for everyone, from a young age.
“In the UK, for example, as an island nation, many people have a strong marine identity — but often the sea is seen as something remote, to visit then retreat from.
“We see conservation and management of marine resources as a matter for government policy, and we do not have policies that directly enable local stewardship.
“We hope our research will help strengthen the concept of marine identity, empower people to protect the ocean, and encourage decision-makers to actively consider the relationships that people have with the sea.”
Researchers at University of California San Diego have published new guidelines that could help scientists significantly improve their results when quantifying the interactions between DNA and proteins. Understanding these interactions is critical to our understanding of human biology in general, and can also help scientists develop new treatments for a wide range of diseases, including many cancers.
The researchers focused on spike-in normalization, a widely-used molecular biology technique that helps ensure accurate and reliable results. Spike-in normalization involves adding a known quantity of chromatin (DNA and the associated proteins) to a sample before it is studied, which helps researchers account for variations between multiple samples being compared to one another. Spike-in normalization is particularly useful for comparing two conditions — such as to evaluate the impact of a drug (comparing treated vs untreated) or a mutation or a deletion in a key gene (comparing normal vs mutant).
By exploring publicly-available datasets that utilize spike-in normalization, the researchers were able to identify common scenarios where spike-in normalization is easily misused and in which building in additional quality control measures and other “guardrails” into the technique could improve results or avoid misinterpretation. By reanalyzing these data and conducting additional experiments of their own, the team was able to develop a list of nine key recommendations for researchers using spike-in normalization that could greatly increase the accuracy of their results. These measures include ensuring consistent quality control steps are taken, following best practices for computational analysis, and validating the results with other analysis techniques.
“Many studies utilize spike-in normalization, and our results call the biological conclusions drawn from this approach into question,” said senior author Alon Goren, Ph.D. “Our recommendations can help account for some of the pitfalls of spike-in normalization so we can still reap the benefits of this valuable technique.”
The study published on September 13, 2024 in Nature Biotechnology and was conducted by Lauren Patel and Yuwei Cao at UC San Diego and Eric Mendenhall, Ph.D. at HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology. The study was co-led by Alon Goren, Ph.D., and Christopher Benner, Ph.D., both associate professors in the Department of Medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine.
In a new study by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), researchers analysed how erratic weather events, increasingly intensified by global warming, affect global production and consumption across different income groups.
The results confirm previous studies that the poorest people worldwide bear the greatest economic risks from climate change. Surprisingly, the risk for the wealthy is growing the fastest. Economies in transition like Brazil or China are also highly vulnerable to severe impacts and negative trade effects. Across countries, these countriesface the highest risks due to severe impacts of volatile weather and adverse trade effects.
As the planet continues to warm, these risks are expected to worsen across most countries, with ripple effects along global supply chains, impacting goods and services worldwide.
“In the next 20 years, climate change will increase economic risks from erratic weather,” states PIK scientist Anders Levermann. “The highest risks remain with the poorest around the world. But the increase of economic risk is strongest for the wealthy, in countries like the US and the EU. Consumers all around the world, regardless of their income, will thus face increasing challenges due to global warming — without a transition towards carbon neutrality we will eventually not be able to meet these challenges.”
Recent Posts
- Earth911 Podcast: MUUS Climate Partners’ Kavita Patel Unpacks the CleanTech Opportunity
- Cuts to England’s canal network could put lives at risk, experts say | Environment
- Researchers find CRISPR is capable of even more than we thought
- Should we protect non-native species? A new study says maybe
- Infographic: 9 Ways Flowers Protect the Environment
Recent Comments